In a message dated 12/11/01 10:39:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
shlomif_at_vipe.technion.ac.il writes:
> I was told MD5 was too slow for things like that. But it was the first
> hash function that came to my mind at a time. I'll try switching to the
> hash function proposed by glib for strings, only adapted for arbitrarily
> sized data.
>
> In any case, I have a hunch that calculating the hash is a neglible part
> of the whole Freecell Solver operations. Profiling the code seems to
> assert this claim.
I achieved my fast times by multitudes of 1% reductions.
Bill Raymond
Received on Tue Dec 11 2001 - 11:05:31 IST