In a message dated 12/11/01 8:59:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
shlomif_at_vipe.technion.ac.il writes:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 WKRfresno_at_aol.com wrote:
> > Didn't Fish use a word different than "MD5" to describe his hash
function?
> At the moment my hash function is indeed MD5? Can you recommend a better
> hash function for a constant "raw" sized data?
Soon enough I will reveal all.
BR
Received on Tue Dec 11 2001 - 23:29:29 IST