Shlomi, thanks. I finally finished my evaluation and got the following 119
step solution. I think it is in a format much easier to follow than your
format (no offense intended!). This was indeed a learning exercise! Much
of this was manual cleanup of your original solution. -Gary
7D AH AS TD 6C TC JH AC
2S 4H 2C 3C TH 5H 9C 7H
9H KH 3H AD 9D 8S JD 7C
5C 4D 8C 6D QS 5D KS 7S
9S 8D JC 6H 4S 3S QH 2D
TS QD 8H QC 2H 6S JS KC
3D KD 4C 5S
GAME #94717719 is solved as follows:
13 5b 5c 52 51 57 5a 6d 65 c6
b5 78 4b 7c 72 78 74 14 d7 67
64 6d 62 a6 d6 1a 1d 12 37 36
38 17 14 31 32 42 36 36 53 5h
75 7h bh 65 67 62 72 7b 7h c6
81 86 16 a7 67 3a b3 23 53 5b
61 6c c5 15 16 5c 75 c7 57 8c
51 71 75 87 8h 81 84 c8 6c 68
c8 5c 58 c8 1c 18 c8 4c 4h 1h
41 4h 5h c5 2c 25 c5 2c 21 c1
2c 24 c4 2c 2h 6h c6 46 42 48
4c d8 a4 27 2a 2b 2h 2d 28 ??
From: Shlomi Fish
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 3:01 PM
To: fc-solve-discuss_at_yahoogroups.com
Cc: gary_at_numin8r.us
Subject: Re: Addendum / Correction
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:48:10 -0700
"Gary Campbell" <mailto:gary%40numin8r.us> wrote:
> Has anyone actually followed this solution?
>
> As a "near intractable" I thought it might be a good study, but
> this solution is "bloody awful!"
>
> I'll try to work out an alternative that might be useful to someone.
> If someone else gets to it first, please post. This could take a few
> hours!
OK. The following fc-solve command line yields a 139 moves-long solution
(where the auto-moves to the foundations are done and counted explicitly):
Received on Sat Oct 13 2012 - 16:22:01 IST