Hi Danny,
On 17 Oct 2013 14:37:25 -0700
<dannyjones183_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't have any performance information. First, my OS is constantly running
> background programs that I can't control -- especially security software.
> This impacts my wall-clock execution timing.
That sucks. Luckily for me, on Linux I don't need all those security software
background programs and can kill the background process that hog the CPU (and
also run the solver at a high priority.).
> Secondly, the prioritization
> algorithm in my solver already flags freecell-to-empty_column as a "low
> priority" move. As such, any attempt for a comparison would be skewed because
> the control run would already be biased against such moves.
>
I see.
> What I do know is that I perform considerably more operations in my
> freecell-to-empty_column logic using your constraint. This has to be a
> drawback on execution time because this routine is executed every time I
> process a layout.
I see. Do you know how many moves/states/iterations/etc. were searched through
in each configuration?
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Parody of "The Fountainhead" - http://shlom.in/towtf
Every successful open source project will eventually spawn a sub‐project.
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
Received on Sun Oct 20 2013 - 07:50:26 IDT