Hi all,
some corrections and updates.
On Mon, 29 May 2017 00:35:57 +0300
"Shlomi Fish shlomif_at_shlomifish.org [fc-solve-discuss]"
<fc-solve-discuss_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Like the subject line says, the freecell-solver MS 32,000 benchmark went below
> the 7 second threshold, and I got this ~6.789s result:
>
One should note that it is not ~6.789s but rather ~6.979s.
> Started at 1495991555.891971
> Started at 1495991555.891971
> Unsolved Board No. 11982 at 1495991558.841448
> Started at 1495991555.891971
> Started at 1495991555.891971
> Started at 1495991555.891971
> Reached Board No. 4000 at 1495991556.797603 (total_num_iters=1413271)
> Reached Board No. 8000 at 1495991557.667971 (total_num_iters=2787181)
> Reached Board No. 12000 at 1495991558.507312 (total_num_iters=4123941)
> Reached Board No. 16000 at 1495991559.463249 (total_num_iters=5599888)
> Reached Board No. 20000 at 1495991560.337991 (total_num_iters=6984235)
> Reached Board No. 24000 at 1495991561.165857 (total_num_iters=8302682)
> Reached Board No. 28000 at 1495991561.999263 (total_num_iters=9636225)
> Finished at 1495991562.870831 (total_num_iters=11017439)
>
> =============
>
> Now I'd like to try adding a compile-time option to disable
> "-ni"/"--next-instance" and related functionality, because it too is
> under-used with '-l obf'. Perhaps it will make matters a little faster too.
>
After implementing it, I found out that it did improve performance and the
benchmark is now down to 6.93182516098022s . It is part of the 4.10.0 release.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/New-versions-of-the-GPL/
I’m not young enough to know everything.
— https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/J._M._Barrie
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
Received on Thu Jun 01 2017 - 08:37:18 IDT